Skip to content

Live demo

This is what the platform tells you about yourself

Every chart below is the real analysis screen, running on a sample student’s term of work. Click around as much as you like — there’s no account, no card, and nothing to fill in.

The numbers on this page are made up. They’re a realistic example, not a real student’s results and not an average of anyone’s. Your own version of this screen is built entirely from questions you’ve actually attempted.

Questions638547 attempted · 91 skipped
Accuracy72.6%397 correct · 150 wrong
Avg time per question76sacross every attempt
Consistency12d48 of the last 90 days active

Performance breakdown

Where the questions came from, and how each went

Correct: 397 (62%)Wrong: 150 (24%)Skipped: 91 (14%)
638questions
  • Correct397(62%)
  • Wrong150(24%)
  • Skipped91(14%)
Mock tests69% accuracy
118 correct 52 wrong30 skipped200 total
Chapter practice73% accuracy
164 correct 61 wrong41 skipped266 total
Mistake reviews76% accuracy
115 correct 37 wrong20 skipped172 total

Subject performance

The three papers, side by side

Physics

184 attempted · 71s avg

Physics accuracy: 68%68%
184
Tried
125
Correct
59
Wrong

Chemistry

162 attempted · 58s avg

Chemistry accuracy: 81%81%
162
Tried
131
Correct
31
Wrong

Maths

201 attempted · 94s avg

Maths accuracy: 70%70%
201
Tried
141
Correct
60
Wrong

Subject comparison

Correct, wrong and skipped per subject

075150Physics, Correct: 125125Physics, Wrong: 5959Physics, Skipped: 3232Physics68% accChemistry, Correct: 131131Chemistry, Wrong: 3131Chemistry, Skipped: 1818Chemistry81% accMaths, Correct: 141141Maths, Wrong: 6060Maths, Skipped: 4141Maths70% acc
  • Correct
  • Wrong
  • Skipped

Accuracy trend

Across your last 8 active days

+25 ptssince Jun 18
50%70%90%avg 69.6%Jun 18: 58%58%Jun 18Jun 25: 61%Jul 2: 66%Jul 9: 64%Jul 16: 71%Jul 16Jul 22: 75%Jul 28: 79%Aug 1: 83%83%Aug 1

Topic level

The actual list of what to fix

Subject scores are too coarse to act on. These are topics, and only ones with enough attempts behind them to be worth believing.

Needs work

  • Maths · Geometry of Argand Plane31%
  • Chemistry · Aromatic Hydrocarbons35%
  • Physics · Friction38%
  • Physics · Projectile Motion42%
  • Chemistry · VSEPR Theory / Hybridization44%

Strongest

  • Chemistry · Significant Figures92%
  • Maths · Solution of Quadratic Equations90%
  • Physics · Speed, Velocity and Acceleration88%
  • Chemistry · Stoichiometry86%
  • Physics · Nuclear Reaction, Fission and Fusion83%
a topic with four attempts isn’t weak or strong yet, so it isn’t in either list

How this gets built

None of this is filled in by hand

Every chart above is built from tags that already exist on the questions, plus one optional tap from you. That’s the whole input — there’s no spreadsheet to maintain and nothing to categorise yourself.

Tags that ship with every question

Each question already carries its subject, chapter, topic, question format, exam, year and shift — recorded when it was transcribed from the real paper.

That’s what makes a topic-level breakdown possible at all. A platform that only knows “Physics” can never tell you it’s specifically rotational motion letting you down.

PhysicsRotational MotionMoment of InertiaSingle correctJEE Main 2023Shift 2

One tap when you get something wrong

The only thing you ever add. When an answer is wrong, you tap why — while it’s still fresh, in about a second.

Theory gapExposure gapExecution gapTiming gap

This is the difference between “you’re weak at Thermodynamics” and “you understand Thermodynamics fine, you keep running out of time on it” — two problems with completely different fixes.

digital error notebooks usually die because tagging every question takes too long — so this one asks for exactly one tap, and only when you’re wrong

Your version of this starts empty.

It fills in as you practise — no setup, no configuring, no tagging anything by hand. Answer questions and the analysis follows.

Create your account

You’re exploring the demo — this is sample data.

Start for real